Free public template · version 1

Law firm client intake and matter-opening checklist

Coordinate a prospective-client inquiry through firm-controlled conflict review, engagement approval, matter opening, minimum access, and a documented closeout without turning the task board into the client file.

  • 5 sections
  • 14 tasks
  • JSON, Markdown, and CSV
  • Internal editorial review
Download
Use in SealTask

The public downloads are plaintext. After import, readable project content is encrypted on your device, while operational metadata remains visible to the service. Reuse is governed by the Public Template license. Already use SealTask? Open this template in SealTask.

Complete template · v1

Law firm client intake

Sections
5
Tasks
14
Schedule anchor
Target matter-opening date

Coordinate a prospective-client inquiry through conflicts, engagement approval, matter opening, and accepted or declined closeout.

Target matter-opening date: The date an accepted matter should be operationally ready; review and engagement gates are scheduled before it.

01

Inquiry

Establish a neutral intake record, ownership, response timing, and minimum inputs.

  1. Immediately route potential deadline or emergency issues

    On receipt, if an inquiry may involve an urgent deadline or emergency issue, use the firm’s approved immediate intake procedure and do not wait for the target matter-opening date or this task board.

    Urgent priority
    • Firm-authorized immediate-response owner is alerted
    • Required status is recorded in the approved intake system
  2. Create a neutral intake reference

    Create the authoritative inquiry in the approved intake system and use only its neutral reference for operational coordination here.

    High priority 7 days before target matter-opening date
    • Authoritative intake record is created
    • Operational checklist uses a neutral reference
  3. Assign the intake owner and response target

    Name the coordinator accountable for routing the inquiry and set the next-response deadline under the firm’s service expectations.

    Medium priority 7 days before target matter-opening date
    • Intake owner has accepted the handoff
    • Next-response target is recorded
  4. Confirm minimum intake inputs in the source system

    Verify that the approved system contains only the information required to route conflict review and the initial fit decision.

    High priority 6 days before target matter-opening date
    • Required routing inputs are present
    • Unnecessary sensitive detail is not requested
02

Conflicts

Route the inquiry through the firm-authorized conflict search and decision path.

  1. Submit the authorized conflict search

    Route approved names and relationships through the firm’s conflict system without copying search terms or results into this checklist.

    High priority 6 days before target matter-opening date
    • Search scope follows the firm-approved process
    • Search is recorded in the authoritative conflict system
  2. Route any conflict escalation to the decision owner

    If the authorized search identifies an issue, assign it to the designated lawyer or committee and pause downstream opening work.

    High priority 5 days before target matter-opening date
    • Authorized conflict decision owner is named
    • Opening work remains paused until a decision exists
  3. Record the conflict gate outcome

    Confirm only that the authoritative conflict process produced an outcome and that any conditions have accountable owners elsewhere.

    High priority 4 days before target matter-opening date
    • Outcome is preserved in the authoritative system
    • Any approval conditions have accountable owners
03

Engagement decision

Confirm fit, capacity, terms, approvals, and the authoritative acceptance decision.

  1. Confirm fit, capacity, and jurisdiction review

    Route the prospective matter to the responsible lawyer for the firm-specific fit, capacity, and jurisdiction decision.

    High priority 4 days before target matter-opening date
    • Responsible lawyer records the authoritative decision
    • Fit, capacity, and jurisdiction outcome is recorded
  2. Approve engagement terms and commercial setup

    Coordinate the firm-authorized scope, rates, billing arrangement, required approvals, and engagement-document owner in source systems.

    High priority 3 days before target matter-opening date
    • Terms have the required authoritative approvals
    • Engagement-document owner is named
  3. Confirm signed terms and formal acceptance

    Verify in the document and billing systems that required terms, signatures, deposits, or other firm conditions are complete.

    High priority 1 day before target matter-opening date
    • Required signed record is complete
    • Formal acceptance is authorized under firm policy
04

Open or close

Open an accepted matter with minimum access or complete the approved decline path.

  1. Create the authoritative matter record

    Open the accepted matter in the practice-management and document systems with the approved identifiers, ownership, and classifications.

    High priority On target matter-opening date
    • Official matter record and identifier exist
    • Responsible lawyer and operational owner are recorded
  2. Provision minimum matter access

    Grant only the access required for assigned work and confirm that ethical walls or other firm restrictions are applied by authorized owners.

    High priority On target matter-opening date
    • Access is limited to current responsibilities
    • Required restrictions are confirmed in source systems
  3. Schedule the first accepted-matter step

    Schedule the first meeting or deliverable in approved systems and assign preparation without copying substantive client detail here.

    Medium priority 1 day after target matter-opening date
    • First accepted-matter step is scheduled
    • Preparation tasks have accountable owners
  4. Complete the approved decline closeout when applicable

    Promptly after a decline decision, confirm authoritative notice, record disposition, access removal, and retention or deletion actions under firm policy; do not wait for the target opening date.

    High priority
    • Authoritative notice status is recorded
    • Required record and access handling is complete
05

Done

Verified intake work moves here after its authoritative outcome is recorded.

Completion stage — move finished work here.

Who this template is for.

  • Law-firm operations teams coordinating prospective-client intake and matter opening.
  • Responsible lawyers and intake owners who need visible handoffs without duplicating the client file.
  • Small firms replacing an informal email-based opening process with a repeatable operational checklist.

When to use it.

  • When a new prospective-client inquiry has enough minimum information to enter the firm intake process.
  • Before substantive work begins or anyone represents that an engagement has been accepted.
  • When conflict review, approval, engagement documentation, billing setup, and access require several owners.

How to put it to work.

  1. Anchor on the target opening date

    Choose the date the approved matter should be operationally ready. The checklist schedules conflict review and engagement steps before that point.

  2. Use neutral references

    Keep names, facts, documents, conflict evidence, and legal analysis in firm-approved systems. Use a neutral intake or matter reference in task titles when needed.

  3. Respect every approval gate

    Assign the firm-designated decision owner for conflicts, fit, terms, and matter opening. A completed coordination task never substitutes for the authoritative decision.

Customize before you commit.

  • Replace generic decision gates with the exact reviewers required by firm policy and applicable professional obligations.
  • Add practice-area or jurisdiction steps only after the responsible lawyer or firm compliance owner approves them.
  • Use a neutral intake number throughout the checklist and resolve identity only in the authorized intake system.
  • Create separate accepted and declined closeout paths that match the firm’s notice, retention, and deletion rules.

Keep the system boundary clear.

SealTask coordinates operational handoffs only. The firm’s intake, conflicts, document, billing, and practice-management systems remain authoritative for identities, facts, advice, evidence, and decisions.

Coordinate in SealTask

  • Neutral intake references, accountable owners, operational response targets, approval status, and matter-opening follow-up.
  • Reminders that conflict, engagement, billing, or access decisions remain outstanding.
  • Operational confirmation that an authoritative firm record was updated by its owner.

Keep in the system of record

  • Prospective-client identity, matter facts, adverse parties, conflict-search inputs, results, analysis, and waivers.
  • Legal advice, privileged communications, evidence, substantive work product, and client documents.
  • Engagement or decline letters, signatures, trust or billing records, retention decisions, and the official matter file.

Common mistakes to avoid.

Starting work before acceptance

An inquiry is not an engagement. Preserve explicit firm-controlled conflict, fit, terms, and acceptance gates before substantive work or access begins.

Copying conflict details into tasks

Conflict inputs and analysis can be highly sensitive. Track that the authorized review is pending or complete and keep its substance in the approved system.

Leaving declined inquiries unresolved

A decline needs an accountable closeout path under firm policy, including authoritative notice status, record handling, and removal of unnecessary access.

Questions about this template.

What should a law firm client intake checklist include?

It should coordinate minimum inquiry capture, conflict review, fit and capacity decisions, engagement approval, signed terms, matter creation, billing setup, minimum access, first meeting preparation, and accepted or declined closeout.

Does this template perform a conflict check?

No. It tracks the operational handoff to the firm’s authorized conflicts process. The search inputs, results, analysis, escalation, and final decision belong in approved firm systems.

Can prospective-client names or matter facts go in SealTask?

Use the data placement approved by your firm. This template is designed around neutral references so identity, facts, documents, and privileged or sensitive content can remain in specialist systems.

Is this legal ethics or professional-responsibility advice?

No. It is a general operations template. The responsible lawyer and firm policy owners must determine the conflict, engagement, notice, retention, jurisdiction, and professional requirements that apply.